‘Banned’ comedy sketch starts conversation on Bath’s freedom of speech


The issue of the Arts at our university has been at centre stage. Whether or not theatre, dance, and music can compete for their spot in a university dominated by Olympic medallists has been on the mind of those who find themselves at the Edge instead of the Sports Training Village most Wednesday afternoons. The Comedy Writing Improvisation and Performance Society (CWIPS) is one of the newest theatrical societies, and their entrance to the campus scene has recently been met with some discomfort.

University of Bath - University of Bath

University of Bath is not known for censorship

“The Bible According to CWIPS” was the title of the performance that had the cramped, upstairs-corner of the Bath Brew House roaring with laughter. The show combined pop culture, Richard Dawkins, and the bestseller of all time – the Bible – to construct an amusingly witty performance. However, prior to the opening night, the society was met with some rather strong requests to edit the show.

Tackling a sensitive issue for some, the committee of CWIPS had tough decisions to make regarding which sketches would make the cut. The aim was to have the crowd laughing out of hilarity rather than uneasiness, so the committee turned to the Students’ Union for a second opinion on one particular sketch. Two SU officials concluded with the committee that the sketch crossed the fine line between humour and offensiveness, and the sketch was swiftly removed from the show.

The idealistic notion that ‘freedom of speech’ seems most poignant in regards to the arts. Material specifically written to challenge perceptions and mock culture.

However, during the opening week one of the SU officials quietly attended one of the rehearsals. Just four hours prior to opening night the committee of CWIPS was told that a sketch involving the depiction of the Prophet Mohammed titled ‘Cooking with Christ’ should be cut. “The SU couldn’t give more of an explanation,” recalls one of the members of the committee regarding the lack of justification given for the changes being made the show, especially on such short notice.

It became known that the Chaplaincy of the University had become involved in the decision making process of the SU. “We were told that the chaplaincy had read it and pronounced that sketch too graphic”, the committee member said, “we come under the authority of the SU, so whilst we don’t necessarily agree with what they asked us to cut we have to respect them as they are elected to their position, however the chaplaincy is not part of the SU.”

The notion that a specific group within the University can influence how the arts at Bath are performed should concern us. Whilst some might sympathise with ‘offensive’ material, this by no means should limit or create a barrier to what we can and can’t say or performed.

The Chaplaincy claimed that the show would have caused “great offence” as the scenes that were cut were “extreme”, it was also added that “the concept of freedom of speech is important and should be respected”.

One student raises his pen in solidarity with the murdered journalists

Students showed solidarity with Charlie Hebdo in January

The idea, therefore, of consulting the Chaplaincy might seem less radical, but the SU’s subsquent implication that the sketches should be removed should alert us.

During a conversation with the SU official, it was made clear that the decisions communicated to the CWIPS committee had been made so as to avoid complaints. Since the show was taking placein a public domain, the inclusivity of the Students’ Union had to be “maintained”.

“We worked very hard in order to make sure our material was enjoyable and pleasant for people of all faiths and backgrounds,” both members of CWIPS highlighted.

The freedom of expression is an important principle to maintain intact at university, especially regarding the arts. Even though the SU has had little experience with censorship of the arts at the University of Bath, the recognition that artistic expression is essential for students to feel free and creative needs to be maintained.


About Author

Gaia Caramazza is the Design Editor at bathimpact (2015/16). She writes about international politics. She is a reporter on University of Bath issues, including the freedom of speech and Students' Union politics.


  1. Pingback: The inclusivity of the Students’ Union had to be “maintained”

  2. Any chance of CWIPS doing a performance on campus of the deleted scene for those curious about what we’re missed? Allowing freedom of expression with the caveat of people knowing that they may be offfended can simply not attend?

  3. “Okay SU officers, we’ve come up with a truly original and revolutionary idea for our next show!”

    “Oh yes?”

    “Yeah. We’re going to do some jokes, right… about RELIGION.”

    “…CWIPS, you geniuses, you’ve done it again!”

  4. yeah it’s hardly revolutionary to make offensive jokes about religion, it’s been done for years.
    I’m a practising Christian, I can laugh about jokes that poke light fun at my religion but from what i’ve seen, most jokes about religion are made purely with the intent to shock and offend so that the ‘comedians’ can make headlines because they’re not good enough to attract attention by actually having talent!

  5. Pingback: The Freethinker - The voice of atheism since 1881 » Comedy group forced to cut prophet sketch

  6. The University of Bath Students’ Union (the SU) is a membership organisation with members from a range of different faith, social and cultural backgrounds, and operates within an agreed set of Values.

    Our student groups organise and take part in a huge range of events and activities, and in each case, those groups are responsible for ensuring that they operate within these Values. In the recent CWIPS production; “The Bible according to CWIPS”, the SU Activities Officer worked with the production team, having consulted a variety of stakeholders, to review the script and requested some edits to be made.

    In line with normal practice, the decision to edit the final version of the script was taken by the relevant SU Officer quickly and efficiently once all the information had been made available.

  7. Pingback: Bath Skeptical Society denounce Chaplaincy at University of Bath | BATH SKEPTICAL SOCIETY

  8. Re Jordan Kenny:

    “… an agreed set of Values”

    Do these include censorship and opposition to free speech?

    I particularly enjoyed the use of the adverb “efficiently”.

  9. “It’s now very common to hear people say, ‘I’m rather offended by that.’ As if that gives them certain rights. It’s actually nothing more… than a whine. ‘I find that offensive.’ It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. ‘I am offended by that.’ Well, so fucking what.” – Stephen Fry

  10. JK should be very pleased that he did not attend the comedy night at UWE with Lee Nelson headlining it. To say that some of the jokes were edgy would be an understatement. But the point was that the comedy night was not to the detriment of those students who would find such a thing offensive – attendance at such events is voluntary and people who are overly sensitive should have the common sense to find something else to do.

    Bath SU is of course, hopelessly undemocratic and opposed to free speech in terms of it not even having proper General Meetings and vetoing the existence of party political societies, but hey, let’s pretend to be sensitive to peoples’ needs even if they can’t actually express them properly.